By clicking “Accept ”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookies Policy for more information.
Blog
Product insights

In-house vs. Third-party Solutions for Mastercard AN4569 Compliance: Making the right choice

Ondřej Slivka
4
min read

When it comes to compliance with Mastercard AN4569 and the implementation of payment data enrichment tools, businesses often find themselves at a crossroads — whether to develop an in-house solution or leverage third-party expertise. While the allure of internal development might be tempting, practical considerations and industry insights often favour the efficiency and effectiveness of external solutions.

The pitfalls of in-house development

Developing an in-house payment data enrichment tool involves creating a comprehensive merchant knowledge base. While this may sound like a viable option at first, the practicalities tell a different story. The process is inherently time-consuming, diverting valuable resources away from core business activities. Furthermore, it's a more expensive endeavor compared to the cost-effective alternative of opting for external solutions.

Maintenance and updates become an ongoing challenge with an in-house solution. Tasks such as adding new entries, removing outdated ones, and implementing changes demand significant manpower. This continuous effort to ensure data correctness can lead to a drain on resources that could be better allocated elsewhere within the organization.

The reality of data correctness

Maintaining data correctness is a critical aspect of compliance with Mastercard AN4569. Notably, the fact that most businesses rebrand every 7-10 years and 8% of logos change yearly underscores the dynamic nature of merchant information. An in-house solution might struggle to keep up with these changes, potentially compromising the accuracy and completeness of payment data.

Below you can see an example of the data correctness process put in place.

example of the TapiX data validation and correctness process
Correctness of enriched data should be priority. Without the correct inputs there can be no quality outputs.

Speed and efficiency at the center

With digital transactions, timing is an absolute key factor. Building an in-house solution could take months, consuming precious time and delaying compliance efforts. In contrast, deploying an external solution, such as partnering with a third-party provider, usually requires just a few weeks. This speed is crucial for businesses seeking swift compliance with Mastercard AN4569 while minimizing disruption to their operations.

Example of a TapiX API implementation that regularly takes 2-3 months to go live for a typical bank in the market
Example of a TapiX API implementation that regularly takes 2-3 months to go live for a typical bank in the market

Why collaborating with a third-party is the way to go

For most companies, the favoured approach for enhancing payment data and complying with Mastercard AN4569 is collaborating with a third-party solution provider. External solutions bring specialized expertise, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness to the table. With a dedicated focus on payment data enrichment, third-party providers can navigate the complexities of compliance more effectively than businesses attempting to manage it internally.  

In conclusion, the decision between in-house and third-party solutions for Mastercard AN4569 compliance is vital. While the idea of internal development may be appealing, the practicalities often tip the scales in favor of external solutions, ensuring businesses can navigate the intricacies of payment data enrichment with speed, accuracy, and efficiency.

Appendix A: Details of scheme compliance requirements 

Sourced from AN4569 Revised Standards for Mastercard Rules (published 4 April 2023) 

Enhanced Merchant Data. Effective 14 October 2023, an Issuer in Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Channel Islands, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Isle of Man,  

Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom or Vatican City must provide to a Cardholder enhanced Merchant data, when available, to help the Cardholder recognize a Transaction when it is queried by the Cardholder. Such enhanced Merchant data includes, when available, without limitation, the Merchant’s public facing or ‘doing business as’ name, location, contact details and logo. The Issuer must provide the enhanced Merchant data via the Issuer’s banking application, mobile wallet, Internet banking interface, or other digital means that provides at least equivalent ease and accessibility for the Cardholder. 

About author

Ondřej Slivka

Senior insider

A seasoned B2B marketing enthusiast with 5+ years of experience sharing insights in the world of digital banking and fintech. My passion lies in crafting innovative strategies and engaging content that delivers desired results.

Table of contents

Recents from our blog.

Product insights

Product insights

What is Data Quality and how to turn messy transaction information into actionable insights? 

Learn about the importance of data quality as you enrich transactional information and discover how to turn it into actionable insights
Michal Maliarov
8
min read
Product insights

In-house vs. Third-party solutions: Navigating Mastercard AN4569 Compliance

Explore the pros and cons of in-house development vs. third-party solutions for Mastercard AN4569 compliance. Make the right choice for your business's payment data enrichment journey.
Ondřej Slivka
4
min read
Product insights

Why Budgeting for Mastercard AN 4569 Compliance is a Strategic Imperative

Discover the strategic importance of allocating a budget for Mastercard AN 4569 compliance. Enhance user trust, mitigate risks, and gain a competitive edge in digital finance.
Ondřej Slivka
3
min read